59. Super-Culture And The Ghost In The Machine

GhostInTheMachinePref­ace: This lit­tle essay is a bit mis­chie­vous, and appar­ently polit­i­cally incor­rect enough to have sparked out­rage in the minds of some sen­si­tive souls from the polite din­ner party set. Although it has no claims to aca­d­e­mic decency, I have pre­served it online as a stim­u­lant to fancier research, since I think the metaphor the essay runs on cap­tures some essen­tial truths.

The essay had its gen­e­sis in the star­tled obser­va­tions of a fresh expa­tri­ate teach­ing in for­eign sur­rounds. In this case, it was the PNG Uni­ver­sity of Tech­nol­ogy, Lae, Papua New Guinea in 1987. I found my untried lib­eral con­science strug­gling to com­pre­hend the sheer incom­pe­tence of peo­ple faced with insti­tu­tions and tech­nol­ogy which didn’t seem to work. Many of the locals were bright and friendly enough, but some­where a spark of insight was miss­ing. Much later, sur­vey­ing Aus­tralia with the naked eyes of a returnee, it was all too clear that the paral­y­sis of imag­i­na­tion was a uni­ver­sal prob­lem.  Con­tinue read­ing

Posted in culture, economics, innovation, intellectuals, management, merit, motivation, philosophy, rules, teaching, truth | Leave a comment

58. Déjà Vu and Wicked Stories

SinsSo why do you read the news every day? Alright, maybe you don’t. I plead guilty. Not all of it of course, just the nar­ra­tives I’ve cho­sen to fol­low. Funny how we pick our com­pany. For me the deletes run through spec­ta­tor sport, most local news – espe­cially the TV favourites/ murders/ muggings/ petty scan­dals, gen­eral gos­sip shock-hor­ror stuff .. it’s an eter­nal cycle. Per­haps that’s the beauty of it for peo­ple who like cor­ner shop rou­ti­nes. Well, hooked on the grand sweep of inter­na­tional affairs, do I lead some blessed, wise and ele­vated life? Par­don the self-mock­ery. In the end it is an addic­tion like any other, per­haps more point­less than most since no happy band of fel­low trav­ellers gath­ers around the com­puter screen to sur­vey the wider world. You can’t walk into any pub, club or work­place and start a con­ver­sa­tion with com­plete strangers on the state of play of pol­i­tics in Zhong­nan­hai, or pop­u­la­tion trends in north­ern Africa (but you can do just that for foot­ball heroes of the hour). Yes, I’m a fool to my own best inter­ests if pop­u­lar­ity is the game, but it is mighty hard to wear the heels of your shoes down in a dif­fer­ent way after grow­ing your own spe­cial slouch. Con­tinue read­ing

Posted in culture, merit, proportion, rules, truth, war | Leave a comment

57. Anchluss or ANZAC? – A Solution for Taiwan

In the minds of China’s rulers, past and present, there has only ever been one pos­si­ble view about the future of Tai­wan. For a mul­ti­tude of rea­sons – strate­gic, eco­nomic, eth­nic, lin­guis­tic, his­tor­i­cal and sen­ti­men­tal – they have believed that it should be prop­erly incor­po­rated as part of the Chi­nese state, and that the expres­sion of any views to the con­trary amount to trea­son. As a res­i­dent of China for five years, I can­not recall encoun­ter­ing any Chi­nese cit­i­zen who did not declare this “proper” sta­tus of Tai­wan to be self-evi­dent when asked. On this topic the Chi­nese edu­ca­tion sys­tem has suc­cess­fully pro­moted a con­sen­sus.

Any­one with a curi­ous mind who has spent time in Tai­wan, or amongst Tai­wanese, will quickly con­clude that the “self-evi­dent” and “proper” sta­tus of Tai­wan as a province of China is by no means accepted amongst the largest num­ber of peo­ple there. The focus of dis­agree­ment within Tai­wan is not on whether to sur­ren­der sov­er­eignty, but on how to retain it. Con­tinue read­ing

Posted in China, competence, law, war | Leave a comment

56. Choose When to Live and When to Die – Some Notes on Exercise and Diet

The more your spirit lives in a cul­ture, the more you  get what you pay for. After all, the cul­ture has evolved, or per­haps been man­u­fac­tured, to sat­isfy peo­ple just like you. Blessed are the aver­age amongst us. Maybe your accepted cul­ture has you sali­vat­ing over a deli­cious din­ner pho­tographed on the plas­tic packet of a snap frozen super­mar­ket meal. You will microwave the dubi­ous mess inside the packet and suck it up. By the time you suck it up, your mind is on TV foot­ball or a soapy any­way. Such is one kind of hap­pi­ness. If your cul­ture is a mil­len­nium old and tells you that meat (or what­ever) is unclean, you will smother some over­cooked veg­eta­bles in curry and wash them down with a litre of Coca Cola to prove that you are up with the times. Such is pro­gress.

These notes on exer­cise and diet have not been writ­ten for aver­age peo­ple in any known cul­ture. ‘Cul­ture’ is short­hand for a rough con­sen­sus on the grab-bag of events, habits, atti­tudes and actions that make up daily liv­ing. Once you start to ask ques­tions about any of this stuff, you are step­ping out­side of the con­sen­sus. You are no longer aver­age. You are alone in the big bad world, and there is noth­ing heroic about it because prob­a­bly there is no one there to clap. So these notes are about non-aver­age sur­vival, specif­i­cally my own. Take what looks use­ful, ignore the rest. Con­tinue read­ing

Posted in culture, lifestyle, Uncategorized | 2 Comments

55. If A Market Is Not A Market …

Long ago when the world was young I went to a high school to learn about the won­der­ful power of Mar­kets and The Invis­i­ble Hand. A mar­ket itself didn’t have to be a shabby patch of ground with fruit stalls and bric-a-brac on sale. A mar­ket was a place, even an imag­i­nary place, where con­tracts were exchanged. Con­tracts were a kind of agree­ment where two par­ties agreed to exchange A for B for mutual ben­e­fit.

Many kinds of con­tracts in his­tory have only been pos­si­ble when both par­ties agreed first of all to fol­low some set of rules. For exam­ple a man and woman might choose to live together because they find each other sex­u­ally excit­ing. Pretty soon how­ever, to avoid con­flict, they come to agree­ments about money, house­work, hav­ing chil­dren (or not), and all the rest. In fact we know that most cul­tures have devel­oped strict for­mal rules about such rela­tion­ships, and sealed the deal with some­thing defined as a mar­riage con­tract.

How­ever, the peo­ple who taught me about mar­ket rela­tion­ships were called econ­o­mists. These econ­o­mists usu­ally con­ceded that there needed to be com­mer­cial rules or laws about par­tic­u­lar kinds of mar­ket rela­tion­ships. For exam­ple, the buy­ers and sell­ers of motor vehi­cles within Aus­tralia have to work within cer­tain rules of dis­clo­sure, com­mit­ment and so on. How­ever, the econ­o­mists insisted that over and above the influ­ence of local, par­tic­u­lar reg­u­la­tions, mar­ket rela­tion­ships were gov­erned by a set of nat­u­ral laws, akin to the ‘laws’ of physics, or per­haps biol­ogy. This was ‘The Invis­i­ble Hand’. For exam­ple, if there were many buy­ers and few sell­ers, the exchange rela­tion­ship (hence the price if money was involved) would be tilted in favour of sell­ers.

The sup­ply and demand law exam­ple seemed rea­son­able to an eco­nomic neo­phyte. Quickly my eco­nom­ics teach­ers pro­jected this nice exam­ple to encom­pass and define the uni­verse of daily life in which we strug­gle to make a dol­lar. At this point in the the­sis, even as a 17 year old, my bull­shit detec­tors went on red alert. The Invis­i­ble Hand sounded remark­ably like the Invis­i­ble God, a trick of social con­trol bran­dished by fright­ened author­ity fig­ures, whom I had long since ceased to hold in awe. Ergo, I repeated the pat­ter they wanted to hear for some exam­i­na­tion papers, duly got an ‘A’ pass, and forever decided that eco­nom­ics was mostly hum­bug.
Con­tinue read­ing

Posted in economics, management, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

53. The South Pacific and Someone’s Restaurant at the End of the Universe

This piece was writ­ten while I was a lec­turer in lin­guis­tics at the Uni­ver­sity of the South Paci­fic, Suva, Fiji  from 1987 to 1990. Now it is 2011, but not so much has really changed in the Paci­fic for its peo­ples. Even inclu­sion into the new elec­tronic uni­verse of the World Wide Web remains a chal­lenge. Fiji is the geopo­lit­i­cal cap­i­tal of these states, a fact not widely appre­ci­ated out­side of the region. Fiji, as pre­dicted, has become enmeshed and stale­mated in con­flict between a quasi-reformist mil­i­tary lead­er­ship and the old colo­nial legacy of com­prador-cap­i­tal­ism (a chiefly class get­ting kick­backs from for­eign busi­ness inter­ests) and at vil­lage level, reli­gious pater­nal­ism of the kind that still con­stricts the Philip­pines and which locked down medieval Europe for a mil­len­nium .  (Find­ing the true heroes in a mess like this is best left to his­tory..). The nascent Melane­sian power of the region, Papua New Guinea, has increased its pop­u­la­tion to 7 mil­lion, but accel­er­ated its down­ward spi­ral into a poverty stricken, cor­rupt and vio­lent morass since being pushed adrift from UN pro­tec­torate sta­tus by Aus­tralia in 1975. (for exam­ple, see the Bris­bane Times, 3 Sep­tem­ber 2011, ” PNG exposed as a dys­func­tional blob“). PNG is not a “failed state”. It never was a state in any mean­ing­ful sense. It is a land of extra­or­di­nary poten­tial, but for cul­tural rea­sons there will be extra­or­di­nary grief along the road to find­ing that poten­tial.  For Aus­tralia it may morph into a seri­ous secu­rity risk. China is now a much more active and some­times cor­rupt­ing player in the region for rea­sons both of geopol­i­tics and resource gath­er­ing (for exam­ple see “China, Tai­wan buy influ­ence with secret pay­ments to Nauru politi­cians”  Bris­bane Times 29/08/2011). Indone­sia, which is described as a mil­i­tary dic­ta­tor­ship in 1989, has since made a sig­nif­i­cant tran­si­tion to democ­racy incor­po­rat­ing a form of devolved provin­cial author­ity. The regional met­ro­pol­i­tan pow­ers of Aus­tralia and New Zealand are, if any­thing, even more blind in pub­lic aware­ness to the Paci­fic Islands states than they were at the orig­i­nal time of writ­ing. The Paci­fic Island states are a “prob­lem” that the Aus­tralian and New Zealand polit­i­cal classes sim­ply don’t know how to deal with since even with good­will, the cul­tural world-views of Paci­fic islanders and West­ern­ers are so rad­i­cally dif­fer­ent. The obser­va­tions below are mostly still as rel­e­vant as they were twenty years ago. [The orig­i­nal post­ing remains on my old web­site, here].

1. Intro­duc­tion

The Restau­rant at the End of the Uni­verse is where we all hope to be on that expan­sive Fri­day evening when the cur­tain comes down for the last encore. There they are, that mot­ley col­lec­tion from his­tory, loung­ing over their drinks, singing, weep­ing, roar­ing with laugh­ter, for what else can you do when there are to be no tomor­rows? So this, Earth Mother, is why we put up with those damned for­eign­ers for count­less mil­len­nia : the priv­i­lege of a seat in Luigi’s Galac­tic Cafe on a space­ship escap­ing to obliv­ion.

In the mean­time, a few tens of mil­len­nia back in Milky Way’s time warp, you and I still have to scheme for tomor­row. This dis­cus­sion paper is one Australian’s unvar­nished view of his neigh­bour­hood. If it wounds a ten­der spot here and there, call the writer a fool and chalk up a debt against him for drinks at the last gasp in Luigi’s. But try to find an idea or two in here as well, for if we stop com­mu­ni­cat­ing this vibrant planet will be a dead planet long before the musi­cians take a bow.

Con­tinue read­ing

Posted in culture, economics, Pacific Islands | Leave a comment

52. Performance-Linked Micro-Tariffs

The let­ter fol­low­ing was addressed to Prime Min­is­ter Keat­ing, 8 July 1995, and later posted on my web­site (http://thormay.net/politics/politic5.html). The reply to me from a min­der was what you might expect: vapid. Nev­er­the­less the points out­lined remain ger­mane to any Aus­tralian gov­ern­ment. Why have I res­ur­rected it here? Well occa­sion­ally web page sta­tis­tics show up some­thing inter­est­ing. Some­body has been access­ing the arti­cle. Curi­ous, I checked and was imme­di­ately struck by the rel­e­vance of “per­for­mance-linked micro-tar­iffs” to Australia’s econ­omy in 2011. What do you think?

Dear Prime Min­is­ter,

Your gov­ern­ment does not have my con­fi­dence on the mat­ter of tar­iffs. You won’t get to read this, being a busy per­son, but with luck an econ­o­mist some­where will put the fol­low­ing argu­ments into a com­puter. For the record, here is the main rea­son for my dis­quiet, and a cou­ple of sug­ges­tions.

1. The Gov­ern­ment has lost the plot on macro-eco­nomic pol­icy. Specif­i­cally, it needs to get sophis­ti­cated about the ancient con­test between free trade and pro­tec­tion. A binary mind-set on this mat­ter is as naive as a so-called left/right dis­tinc­tion in polit­i­cal belief. There have been good rea­sons to demol­ish blan­ket tar­iff bar­ri­ers over the last two decades. There are now com­pelling rea­sons to grad­u­ally estab­lish what I will call “per­for­mance-linked micro-tar­iffs” in selected sec­tors of Aus­tralian indus­try.  Con­tinue read­ing

Posted in competence, culture, economics, law, regulations | Leave a comment